![]() We just need people to behave with honor and decency. We don't need more "compliance" training or clearer "guidelines." We don't need special displays of "leadership," "from the top" or otherwise. All of which is fine, unless that machinery is getting in the way of doing something about the sexual exploitation of women, as it did on Tuesday, when two make-work professionals complacently defended the broken system that gives them a paycheck and jokes were made about '90s sitcoms. It's very boring, frequently unrewarding work that involves lots of numbers and acronyms and pointless hearings. We also need to stop fetishizing the idea of people in power as glamorous hedonistic perverts à la House of Cards, a show that, astonishingly, utilized the talents of a real-life hedonistic pervert to realize its only slightly exaggerated vision of D.C.īeing part of Congress isn't sexy. We need to stop pretending that the circumstances described in a recent CNN report, in which the halls of Congress are a flesh market in which it is unremarkable for legislators to flirt with and grope members of their staff and even one another, in which a list is circulated samizdat-style of "creeps" who have to be avoided, can be dealt with using posters and bureaucratic legalese. No wonder, as Lett explained, some 85 percent of cases never go to litigation. Finally, after mediation, if by some miracle you have not been successfully bribed or otherwise browbeaten into remaining silent - or just quit your job in frustration in the meantime - you have the privilege of waiting yet another 30 days before you are allowed to have a hearing either with Office of Compliance or, if you've been very patient, in federal district court. After a month has passed, the complainant then goes into "mediation" with someone who represents the office of the person they are accusing, for up to another 30 days. The process she is describing involves, among other things, undergoing 30 days of counseling before filing a formal sexual harassment case against a congressional staffer or member of Congress. "I think it's a highly effective process." ![]() "I have a very different take," she said. Asked by another member what can be done to improve the situation, she stumbled for a moment. Good one.īut the best of all was Lett, whose unimprovable job title of "counsel for the Office of House Employment Counsel" will bring me joy until Christmas at least. Comstock also made a joke about George on Seinfeld getting fired because he didn't know it was against the rules to have sex on his desk at work. I am sure that it is only the current lack of a piece of paper that is preventing the very honorable and decent public servants we have duly elected from realizing that gross old men preying on young women in their employ is something of an ethical hang-up. "It doesn't say you cannot have that." You might even be right, congresswoman, especially since no one appeared to contradict you. ![]() Barbara Comstock (R-Va.) also seemed to be very keen on notices and "guidelines." "We really don't have current guidelines that say that a member with a 19-year-old intern is inappropriate," she said. Adults, especially those with college degrees, proud service in our nation's Armed Forces, decades of experience getting things done in the private sector, and the other sorts of things that you generally find on the CVs of congressmen, learn these things from posters when they are 40 or 50 years old. BlueBlazer McEntrepreneurship that he should not under any circumstances be showing his penis to members of his staff or his fellow representatives. She then proceeded to explain why putting up posters full of legalese written in tiny print is the surest way of making it absolutely clear to Rep. "There is no law that requires anybody in Congress to post these notices," she said. Asked what was the most important step that could be taken to prevent sexual harassment by members of Congress and their staff, Childs Wallace, whose actual job title is "chairwoman of the Office of Compliance's board of directors," without blinking, held up a piece of paper. My favorite special guests were Barbara Childs Wallace of the CAA-OCC and Gloria Lett of OHEC, surely two of the dimmest bulbs in the not exactly radiant ceiling of previously unknown federal acronymed agencies. ![]() From start to finish, the proceedings were a bland, tedious exercise in the deployment of managerial professionalist BS in service of a status quo that virtually everyone in the room either approves of or would be happy to ignore.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |